Ajit Pawar began his remarks by expressing heartfelt condolences to Vaishnavi Hagwane’s family, acknowledging the deep pain and loss they are experiencing. He emphasized the need for a thorough and transparent investigation, assuring the public that justice must be delivered and that the legal process should be allowed to proceed without interference or prejudice.
Pawar’s statement comes at a time when the case has sparked intense debate about dowry harassment, women’s safety, and the influence of powerful families in criminal investigations. By speaking out, he aimed to calm tensions and reaffirm the party’s commitment to supporting the affected family and upholding the law.
A significant portion of Ajit Pawar’s statement was devoted to addressing the rumors and controversies that have surrounded Vaishnavi’s marriage. In particular, he spoke about the so-called ‘marriage fortune’—the story that has circulated regarding dowry and the expectations placed on the family during the wedding.
Pawar explained that, like many families, there were certain traditional customs and expectations involved in the marriage. However, he stressed that the focus must remain on the facts established by the ongoing investigation, rather than on speculation or hearsay. He acknowledged that dowry harassment is a serious social issue that must be confronted, but he also urged the public and media not to politicize the tragedy or draw premature conclusions.
Recognizing the sensitive nature of the case, Ajit Pawar appealed to both the public and the media to respect the privacy of the Hagwane family as the investigation unfolds. He cautioned against sensationalism and urged everyone to allow the authorities to do their work, emphasizing that justice can only be achieved through a fair and unbiased process.
Pawar’s remarks were also an implicit call for introspection within society about the persistence of dowry practices and the need for cultural change. He reiterated the importance of addressing such issues seriously, but warned that politicizing personal tragedies can hinder both justice and healing.
Ajit Pawar’s intervention is significant, as it marks the first direct response from a senior NCP leader on the case. His statement is seen as an effort to de-escalate political tensions and to demonstrate the party’s willingness to cooperate fully with the investigation. It also signals to the public that the case is being taken seriously at the highest levels of leadership.
