The state government has unveiled comprehensive guidelines dictating how government employees must conduct themselves on social media. The new rules, designed to reinforce administrative discipline and protect the reputation of state authorities, specifically prohibit government workers from criticizing current government policies or sharing official information online without prior approval.
Officials are also encouraged to avoid debates on contentious policy issues and abstain from posting material that could be interpreted as “embarrassing” to the government or its administrative machinery.
According to the circular issued by the state’s General Administration Department, the new guidelines are intended to maintain a “neutral and disciplined” administrative environment. The government highlighted cases where employees, knowingly or unknowingly, posted views on ongoing policy debates, strikes, or administrative setbacks; sometimes leading to public controversy or media scrutiny.
The document further clarifies that these rules are in alignment with the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, which already caution civil servants against criticizing the government publicly. The proliferation of social media has, however, prompted authorities to issue clearer and stronger guidelines addressing new digital realities.
Government employees found violating these social media norms face consequences under service rules. Actions may range from formal warnings to suspension or other disciplinary measures, depending on the nature and gravity of the violation. The government has also mandated departments to monitor staff social media behavior more closely.
Supporters of the rules argue that these measures are crucial to preserving public trust in the bureaucracy, preventing misinformation, and safeguarding the confidentiality of governmental processes. They assert that state employees, as public servants, have a responsibility to present a unified, professional front.
However, critics including some legal experts and employee unions contend that the guidelines risk infringing on constitutional freedoms of speech and fair criticism. They note that, while neutrality is essential for public servants, a complete bar on critical commentary could stifle constructive feedback and transparency, both critical to good governance. Some have called for greater consultation with employees and legal review to ensure that rights are balanced with administrative discipline.
Maharashtra is not alone in taking this step: in recent years, several Indian states, as well as central government departments, have tightened social media norms for employees in response to rising digital activism and information leaks. The rise of platforms such as X, Facebook, and WhatsApp in professional circles has made it easier for sensitive information or dissenting views to spread rapidly compelling governments to take preventive action.