SC: Enforcing Menstrual Leave Could Set Back Women's Professional Progress The Bridge Chronicle
News

SC: Enforcing Menstrual Leave Could Set Back Women's Professional Progress

The Supreme Court stated that it would be "excellent" if private companies voluntarily offered period leaves, but enforcing them as mandatory could negatively impact women's careers.

Akanksha Kumari

On Friday, the Supreme Court stated that enforcing mandatory menstrual leave in workplaces could negatively impact women's employment prospects, as companies might become reluctant to hire them. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, as they declined to consider a petition requesting menstrual leave for female students and working women throughout India.

Join our WhatsApp Channel to Stay Updated!

The highest court remarked that it would be "excellent" if private firms voluntarily offered these leaves, but enforcing them as mandatory could negatively impact women's careers. The Chief Justice of India, as reported by LiveLaw, stated, "Once you make it a legal requirement, no one will hire them, whether in the judiciary or government positions, effectively ending their careers. They will be told to stay at home after notifying everyone."

The Chief Justice of India also mentioned that requests to legalize such leaves are intended to instill fear and label women as 'inferior,' suggesting that menstruation is a negative occurrence for them. The Supreme Court panel encouraged the petitioner to consider the implications of requiring employers to provide additional paid leave.

The court stated that the appropriate authority might evaluate the proposal and explore the potential of creating a policy on menstrual leave after consulting with all pertinent stakeholders. According to reports, Shailendra Mani Tripathi submitted a plea highlighting to the court that some states, such as Kerala, have already implemented relaxations in schools, and certain private companies have done the same for their female employees.

While the Supreme Court bench agreed with granting period leaves voluntarily, it also highlighted the potential impact of such measures on workplace perceptions and the professional growth of women.In 2024, the court had voiced similar worries, cautioning about its harmful impact on women.

There have been ongoing calls for the introduction of paid menstrual leave. Proponents believe women should receive specific monthly leave to rest during their menstrual cycle, while opponents contend that such a policy might reinforce gender stereotypes.

Help Us Create the Content You Love

Take Survey Now!

Enjoyed reading The Bridge Chronicle?
Your support motivates us to do better. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Whatsapp to stay updated with the latest stories.
You can also read on the go with our Android and iOS mobile app.

Gas Shortage Disrupts Meals at Savitribai Phule Pune University; Students Warn of Protesting at VC’s Residence

Apple Turns 50: Tim Cook Shares Heartfelt 'Thank You' Note Ahead of April 1 Anniversary

Infosys Pune Advises Employees to Bring Meals from Home, Avoid Campus Events Amid LPG Shortage

Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen Set to Step Down After 18 Years

Pune: As Summer Begins, 'Tanker Raj' is Back; Demand Surges Across City

SCROLL FOR NEXT